An Experimental Comparison of Min-Cut/Max-Flow Algorithms

上传者: ilovejohnny | 上传时间: 2019-12-21 18:50:23 | 文件大小: 3.38MB | 文件类型: pdf
最大流/最小割算法的简介,理解常用最大流最小割概念的文献,值得学习。 minimum cut/maximum flow algorithms on graphs emerged as an increasingly useful tool for exact or approximate energy minimization in low-level vision. The combinatorial optimization literature provides many min-cut/max-flow algorithms with different polynomial time complexity. Their practical efficiency, however, has to date been studied mainly outside the scope of computer vision. The goal of this paper is to provide an experimental comparison of the efficiency of min-cut/max flow algorithms for applications in vision. We compare the running times of several standard algorithms, as well as a new algorithm that we have recently developed. The algorithms we study include both Goldberg-Tarjan style “push-relabel” methods and algorithms based on Ford- Fulkerson style “augmenting paths.” We benchmark these algorithms on a number of typical graphs in the contexts of image restoration, stereo, and segmentation. In many cases, our new algorithm works several times faster than any of the other methods, making near real-time performance possible. An implementation of our max-flow/min-cut algorithm is available upon request for research purposes.

文件下载

评论信息

免责申明

【只为小站】的资源来自网友分享,仅供学习研究,请务必在下载后24小时内给予删除,不得用于其他任何用途,否则后果自负。基于互联网的特殊性,【只为小站】 无法对用户传输的作品、信息、内容的权属或合法性、合规性、真实性、科学性、完整权、有效性等进行实质审查;无论 【只为小站】 经营者是否已进行审查,用户均应自行承担因其传输的作品、信息、内容而可能或已经产生的侵权或权属纠纷等法律责任。
本站所有资源不代表本站的观点或立场,基于网友分享,根据中国法律《信息网络传播权保护条例》第二十二条之规定,若资源存在侵权或相关问题请联系本站客服人员,zhiweidada#qq.com,请把#换成@,本站将给予最大的支持与配合,做到及时反馈和处理。关于更多版权及免责申明参见 版权及免责申明